US Prepares to Overthrow Malaysian Government

Key to encircling and containing China, US sets proxies in motion for color revolution in Malaysian streets. 

Image: US-proxy Anwar Ibrahim leads a Bersih rally in
Malaysia. While Bersih has attempted to claim it is “independent” and
simply pursusing “fair and clean elections,” it is clearly a vehicle for
returning Anwar Ibrahim back into power. Additionally, Bersih shares
the same ties to the US State Department’s National Endowment for
Democracy (NED) as its crypto-leader Anwar Ibrahim – representing a
dangerous and seditious conflict of interest.


May 15, 2013 (AltThaiNews) – US-funded opposition fronts have
vowed to overthrow the Malaysian government via disruptive and
potentially violent street protests in the wake of general elections
that saw their leader Anwar Ibrahim soundly defeated despite massive
support from Western media, NGOs, and direct government intervention.
Free Malaysia Today (FMT) reported in their article, “‘BN will be toppled this year’,” that:

Pro-Pakatan Rakyat groups have vowed to overthrow the Barisan Nasional government this year through a massive street rally.

Speakers at a forum held yesterday unanimously agreed that waiting for five years until the next

general election was too long, and vowed to overthrow BN this year through “force”.

 FMT also added that:

Electoral watchdog group Bersih 2.0 steering committee member
 Hishamuddin Rais pointed out that it was useless to take their
unhappiness to the courts as he claimed the justice system was being
controlled by the government.

“That is why we must take to the streets. We have to come out. What
Najib likes is wrong, and what he doesn’t like is what we have to do,”
he said.

“We will mobilise a big group and rally on the streets. This is not a threat, this is a promise,” he stressed.

Bersih, of course, is a US State Department-funded opposition front
aimed to bolster US-proxy candidate Anwar Ibrahim, formerly of the IMF
and World Bank, and a frequent visitor to the insidious National Endowment for Democracy (NED) in Washington D.C. It is in fact, NED that funds Bersih through its subsidiary, the National Democratic Institute (NDI).

The Malaysian Insider reported on June 27, 2011
that Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevassan: 

“…admitted to Bersih receiving
some money from two US organisations — the National Democratic
Institute (NDI) and Open Society Institute (OSI) — for other projects,
which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9 march.” 

A visit to the
NDI website revealed indeed that funding and training had been provided
by the US organization – before NDI took down the information and
replaced it with a more benign version purged entirely of any mention of Bersih.
For funding Ambiga claims is innocuous, the NDI’s rushed obfuscation of
any ties to her organization suggests something far more sinister at play.

Photo: NDI’s website before taking down any mention to Malaysia’s Bersih movement. (click image to enlarge)


In addition to Bersih, other faux-electoral monitors are also directly
funded by the US government. While the Western media attempts to portray
such organizations as “independent,” the Merdeka Center for Opinion
Research, for example, is likewise funded directly by the US through NED.

Anwar Ibrahim himself was
Chairman of the Development Committee of the World Bank and
International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at
the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins
University, was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined National Endowment for Democracy’s “Democracy Award” and a panelist at a NED donation ceremony
– the very same US organization funding and supporting Bersih and
so-called “independent” election monitor Merdeka – paints a picture of
an opposition running for office in Malaysia, not for the Malaysian
people, but clearly for the corporate financier interests of Wall Street
and London.

 Photo: Taken from the US National Endowment for Democracy’s 2007 Democracy Award event
held in Washington D.C., Anwar Ibrahim can be seen to the far left and
participated as a “panelist.” It is no surprise that NED is now
subsidizing his bid to worm his way back into power in Malaysia. (click
image to enlarge)


Without a doubt, this premeditated sedition aimed at Malaysia’s ruling
government has been designed, funded, and directed from Washington on
behalf of Wall Street and London, not by the Malaysian people on behalf
of Malaysia’s best interests.

The street protests conducted by Bersih have all the hallmarks of
US-backed “color revolutions,” and this recent attempt to overturn
election results that do not favor an overt US-proxy, foreshadows the
same destructive, divisive, violent, and regressive unrest that has
plagued Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Syria after US-engineered uprisings
have left each in turn destabilized, failed states overrun by
extremists, dictators, and traitors many times worse than the
governments activists sought to overthrow.

And with Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, and Syria in hindsight, will Malaysians
fall into this same familiar trap? Whatever discontent Malaysians may
have with the current government, it is all but assured Bersih and
US-proxy candidate Anwar Ibrahim will compound perceived injustices
while compromising Malaysia’s political, social, and economic stability,
and begin channeling Malaysia’s resources and energy toward foreign
interests and designs, particularly those involving the encirclement and containment of China.

An Alternative to the Tired Ploy of “Street Protests”

For the average Malaysian seeking progress, a better bet than joining
US-funded sedition would be to turn their attention toward organizing
locally and focusing on pragmatic, rather than political, goals. Education, local economic development, health,
and local infrastructure are all areas Malaysians, regardless of
political affiliations, can work together on and improve regardless of
who holds public office.

And while special interests, both foreign and domestic, can indeed
hinder such progress, they do not make such progress impossible. What is
certain, is that corruption amongst Malaysia’s ruling party pales in
comparison to that of Wall Street and London – and Malaysians will place
themselves in the path of guaranteed destruction by inviting in the
very people who dominated them before achieving a hard-won independence.

Democracy, in reality, is supposed to be a bottom-up exercise drawn from
the grassroots. Bersih is clearly a vehicle for Anwar Ibrahim and his
political machine – one whose message is funded, crafted, and declared
from Anwar’s political advisers and foreign backers, and disseminated
across the movement – however cleverly “democratized” Bersih may attempt
to appear.

Malaysians do not need a political party to improve education, to grow
their own food, to develop business locally by leveraging technology, or
to improve local infrastructure and strengthen local communities. The
time being wasted to assist Anwar Ibrahim’s worming back into political
power at the cost of peace, stability, and prosperity could be better
spent developing truly grassroots pragmatic power.

Real revolutions
do not happen out on the streets – they are manifested in our schools,
across industry, and within our communities. They are marked by
pragmatism and true, enduring technological and socioeconomic progress –
none of which are even promised by Bersih and Anwar Ibrahim’s “People’s
Alliance.”  If the people of Malaysia truly want “change,” they are
going to have to do it themselves by building local institutions that
technologically and pragmatically solve real problems rather than simply
craft slogans and campaign promises that merely pander to the concerns
of the people. Following the flags of Bersih into the streets will 
undoubtedly begin instability and division across Malaysian society that
will jeopardize, not spur, real and very necessary pragmatic progress.