Seeking to co-opt the tech community, NDItech opens doors and taxpayers’ pocketbooks to lure in talent.
Image: A visual representation of the corporate-financier interests represented on the National Endowment for Democracy’s (NED) board of directors. NDItech falls under the umbrella of NED. While NED and NDItech pose as fighting for “democracy,” their corporate-financier interests lie poorly disguised just beneath the surface. Surely Goldman Sachs, Exxon, and the SOPA-sponsoring US Chamber of Commerce don’t care about democracy or freedom – on the Internet or elsewhere.
May 1, 2013 (LD) – The National Democratic Institute (NDI) is one of many tentacles descending from the US State Department and its National Endowment for Democracy (NED) front. Despite NED and NDI’s lofty mission statements about “promoting democracy worldwide,” the interests they represent are clearly those of the Fortune 500, including big-oil, retail, media, banking, and defense. This convergence of corporate-financier interests pervade the US government from the top, via corporate-funded policy think tanks that direct US policy at home and abroad, and out the bottom through corporate-chaired and funded NGOs that oversee the execution of this policy.
NED, for example includes the following directors:
Robert Miller: corporate lawyer.
Larry Liebenow: US Chamber of Commerce (a chief proponent of SOPA, ACTA, and CISPA), Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE).
Richard Gephardt: US Representative, Boeing lobbyist, Goldman Sachs, Visa, Ameren Corp, and Waste Management Inc lobbyist, corporate consultant, consultant & now director of Ford Motor Company, supporter of the military invasion and occupation of Iraq in 2003.
Marilyn Carlson Nelson: CEO of Carlson, director of Exxon Mobil.
Stephen Sestanovich: US State Department, Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, CFR.
Judy Shelton: director of Hilton Hotels Corporation & Atlantic Coast Airlines.
Does Boeing, Goldman Sachs, Exxon, and the SOPA, ACTA, CISPA-sponsoring US Chamber of Commerce care about promoting democracy abroad? Or in expanding their corporate-financier interests under the guise of promoting democracy? Clearly the latter.
Other directors include Francis Fukuyama, Zalmay Khalilzad, Will Marshall, and Vin Weber – all certified warmongers and signatories of pro-war papers imploring the US to invade and expand its military presence in Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Libya, and now Syria.
The NED’s game is growing old, and many nations not only recognize the threat these insidious organizations pose through their stable of NGOs, but have now devised effective strategies to expose and purge them from within their borders. Russia has led the way, forcing NGOs to reveal openly their funding, and thus compromising their perceived legitimacy and neutrality – a major problem for NED-funded fronts who attempt to portray themselves as “independent,” as election-monitor GOLOS attempted to do before Russian elections in 2011.
mage: A screenshot fromNED’s official website,
listing GOLOS as a recipient of NED funding, which in turn is provided
by the US State Department. Despite this overt conflict of interest –
especially with NED subsidiaryInternational Republican Institute chairman John McCainopenlythreatening Russia with “Arab Spring” unrest,
“journalists” and GOLOS itself continue using the term “independent” election monitors. (click image to enlarge)
Thailand’s NED-funded front, Prachatai, also deceived its readers regarding the nature of its funding, and still to this day claims to be “independent” despite finally revealing substantial aid from foreign governments, including NED.
Old Dog, New Trick?
However, now, these interests are trying a new trick – co-opting the planet’s tech community, both to augment its current activities, and to blunt the devastating blow the tech community has so far dealt big-business special interests.
NED’s NDI has spun off NDItech DemocracyWorks which seeks to leverage emerging technology to manipulate and undermine targeted nations, just as NED has done through NGOs for years. NDItech’s website states:
The NDItech DemocracyWorks blog provides a platform
for NDI to engage in ongoing conversations about the important and
increasing role technology plays in politics and democratic development.
The blog is managed by NDI’s ICT (information and communication
NDI provides technical assistance to our democracy partners around
the world including political parties, legislatures, civic groups, other
organizations and individuals in more than 70 countries.
Our programs help these groups strengthen democratic institutions,
safeguard elections, advance citizen engagement, and promote open and
accountable government in their countries. The ICT team assists NDI
partners and staff members around the world integrate technology tools
into our democracy assistance programs in innovative and sustainable
The software engineer will develop and maintain software applications
for NDI democracy programs around the world and for internal business
applications. The ideal candidate is versatile and likes to work in a
very dynamic environment on several projects in parallel. This position
requires an engineer who is passionate about new technologies, who keeps
current with software development trends, and who has the ability to
not only code but also advise NDI staff and partners on using technology
to meet objectives and to solve problems.
NDItech will in essence, be developing technology to bolster the many fake revolutions and armed violence the US State Department is busy orchestrating on behalf of the corporate-financier interests that direct US policy and both fund and chair NED, NDI, and now NDItech.
NDItech in Bed with SOPA, ACTA, CISPA Sponsors
Most ironically, when it was pointed out to NDItech that they were attempting to co-opt Internet activist Aaron Swartz’ work to help the very interests he fought against, they replied by stating:
“Not sure what you’re talking about. We’re strongly opposed to all those pieces of legislation and some of us knew Aaron.”
The people at NDItech claim they “knew Aaron.” They also feign ignorance regarding their organization being steered by the US Chamber of Commerce, claimed by CNET to be “SOPA’s most aggressive defender.” In fact, CNET wrote a 2011 article titled, “SOPA’s most aggressive defender: U.S. Chamber of Commerce,” which stated:
There is no more influential business lobby group in the world than the
U.S. Chamber of Commerce, which boasts that its “core purpose is to
fight for free enterprise” and “individual freedom.”
Which is why the Chamber’s unflagging–even unyielding–support of a
controversial copyright bill loathed by Silicon Valley might come as
something of a surprise. Not only do critics view the Stop Online Piracy Act
as antithetical to the individual freedom the Chamber applauds, but the
technology industry has contributed more to economic growth and free
enterprise in the last decade than Hollywood has.
Yet the Chamber has been even more aggressive than the Motion Picture Association of America
and the Recording Industry Association of America in defending SOPA and
attacking the legislation’s critics. SOPA would allow the Justice
Department to seek a court order to be served on search engines,
Internet providers, and other companies that would force them to make a
suspected piratical Web site effectively vanish from the Internet.
While CNET attempts to break down the Chamber’s support for SOPA into a left/right, Democrat vs. Republican issue, the reality is that the corporate-financier interests represented by the Chamber, drive the policy of both sides of the aisle – which is why a Neo-Con chaired NED directly funds both the National Democratic Institute, which is indeed affiliated with the Democrat Party, and the International Republican Institute.
Additionally, the NDI itself lists the Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE), a joint project of the US Chamber of Commerce and NED, as one of its “American Partners.” It states:
The Center for International Private Enterprise (CIPE) strengthens
democracy around the globe through private enterprise and
market-oriented reform. Its key program areas include anti-corruption,
advocacy, business associations, corporate governance, democratic
governance, access to information, the informal sector and property
rights, and women and youth.
CIPE’s board of directors consists almost entirely of US Chamber of Commerce members, including:
- Stanton D. Anderson: Senior Counsel to the President and CEO, U.S. Chamber of Commerce
- Myron A. Brilliant: Executive Vice President and Head International Affairs, U.S. Chamber of Commerce
- Thomas J. Donohue: President and CEO, U.S. Chamber of Commerce
Also on CIPE’s board of directors is Peter M. Cleveland, Vice President of Legal and Corporate Affairs and Global Policy of Intel. Cleveland literally wrote a letter to Congress in support of CISPA, SOPA’s successor. Cleveland wrote specifically:
On behalf of Intel Corporation, as well as our subsidiary McAfee, I am writing to offer our support for the “Cyber Intelligence Sharing and Protection Act of 2011.” We believe the policy changes and legal protections implemented by the bill represent meaningful improvements in the important area of information sharing for cybersecurity purposes.
Of course, then, NDItech “knew Aaron,” because he was the man fighting directly against NDItech and the very people they work for. CIPE is listed as one of NDI’s “American Partners” and is funded right alongside NDI by their umbrella group, NED. These are the very people involved in the revolving doors between big-business and big-government that got SOPA, ACTA, and CISPA as far as they did, and are the same people who will continue fighting against Internet freedom well into the foreseeable future.
The arrogance of NDItech, and other fronts like them, is that they believe the tech community is as easily led as the many willing but perhaps unwitting activists they dupe into working for their crypto-corporate NGOs worldwide. They apparently do not believe those across the tech community possess the ability to do some simple background checking into NDItech and who they are affiliated with, and realize the fox is attempting to guard the hen house.
Sequencing NDI’s Corporate Fascist DNA
NDI’s shady partnership with CIPE aside, NDI itself hosts a myriad of compromised interests tied directly to big-business. Some select members include:
- Robin Carnahan: Formally of the Export-Import Bank of the United States where she “explored innovative
ways to help American companies increase their sale of goods and
services abroad.” The NDI’s meddling in foreign nations, particularly in elections on behalf of pro-West candidates favoring free-trade, and Carnahan’s previous ties to a bank that sought to expand corporate interests overseas constitutes an alarming conflict of interests.
- Richard Blum: An investment banker with Blum Capital, CB Richard Ellis. Engaged in war profiteering along side the Neo-Con infested Carlyle Group, when both acquired shares in EG&G which was then awarded a $600 million military contract during the opening phases of the Iraq invasion.
- Bernard W. Aronson: Founder of ACON Investments. Prior to that, he was an adviser to Goldman Sachs, and serves on the boards of directors of Fifth & Pacific Companies, Royal Caribbean International, Hyatt Hotels Corporation, and Chroma Oil & Gas, Northern Tier Energy. Aronson is also a member of the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) which in turn represents the collective interests of some of the largest corporations on Earth.
- Sam Gejdenson: NDI’s profile claims Gejdenson is “in charge of” Sam Gejdenson International, which proclaims on its website “Commerce Without Borders,” or in other words, big-business monopolies via free-trade. In his autobiographical profile, he claims to have promoted US exports as a Democrat on the House International Relations Committee. Here is yet another case of conflicting interests between NDI’s meddling in foreign politics and board members previously involved in “promoting US exports.”
- Nancy H. Rubin: CFR member.
- Vali Nasr: CFR member and a senior fellow at the big-oil, big-banker Belfer Center at Harvard.
- Rich Verma: A partner in the Washington office of Steptoe & Johnson LLP – an international corporate and governmental legal firm representing for Verma, a multitude of conflicting interests and potential improprieties. Setptoe & Johnson is active in many of the nations the NDI is operating in, opening the door for manipulation on both sides to favor the other.
- Lynda Thomas: A private investor, formally a senior manager/CPA at Deloitte Haskins & Sells in New York, and Coopers & Lybrand Deloitte in London. Among her clients were international banks.
- Maurice Tempelsman: Chairman of the board of directors of Lazare Kaplan International Inc.,
the largest cutter and polisher of “ideal cut” diamonds in the United
States. Also senior partner at Leon Tempelsman & Son, involved in mining, investments and business development and minerals
trading in Europe, Russia, Africa, Latin America, Canada and Asia. Yet another immense potential for conflicting interests, where Tempelsman stands to directly gain financially and politically by manipulating foreign governments via the NDI.
- Elaine K. Shocas: President of Madeleine Albright, Inc., a private investment firm. She was chief of staff to the U.S.
Department of State and the U.S. Mission to the United Nations during
Madeleine Albright’s tenure as Secretary of State and Ambassador to the
United Nation, illustrating a particularly dizzying “revolving door” between big-government and big-business.
- Madeleine K. Albright: Chair of Albright Stonebridge Group and Chair of Albright Capital Management LLC, an investment advisory firm – directly affiliated with fellow NDI board member Elaine Shocas, representing an incestuous business/government relationship with overt conflicts of interest. Albright infamously stated that sanctions against Iraq which directly led to the starvation and death of half a million children “was worth it.”
Again, big-oil, big-banking, and big-defense. These are, without a doubt, the very people Aaron Swartz was resisting. These are the very interests across big business, that championed for SOPA (.pdf), ACTA, and CISPA. NDI is directly affiliated with people who literally and very openly championed for SOPA, ACTA, and CISPA. Their boldfaced lies claiming they were ” strongly opposed to all those pieces of legislation” says much about how they view the intelligence of tech community they seek to compromise, co-opt, and employ to promote the very sort of encroachments on our civil liberties many in the tech community are fighting against.
Don’t Work for NDItech, Work for Yourself and Your Community
It is the greatest victory for them to take enemies like Aaron Swartz and those who supported his activism, and turn them into tools for special interests. It is our greatest victory when we expose them, ostracize them, boycott the special-interests that subsidize their insidious work, and replace them permanently with local alternatives.
The NDItech tweet searching for prospective employees stated:
Got Drupal? We’re hiring. Come build stuff for us.
However, do yourself a favor and don’t go “build stuff for them.” Build stuff for yourself and your community, because you and your community are the only ones who have your own best interests at heart. NDItech is a fraud, at face value, and disturbingly more so as you dig beneath the layers of corporate fascism and conflicts of interest.
Learn the tricks they use to co-opt talented, well-intentioned, intelligent young people, and take a look across the rest of the tech landscape to see who else is playing a similar game. There is nothing they can offer or provide for you, that you and your community cannot do yourselves better, more honestly, and truly for your own best interests.